When managing construction projects, it is vital to take into account the costs of materials. Ensuring that your budget remains on target and preventing excessive spending requires effective solutions. Given the constant fluctuations in material expenses, it is crucial to employ appropriate resources and strategies to negotiate price limits.

If you are seeking guidance on how to effectively handle Construction Material Costs Escalation, continue reading for key best practices.

Assessing Construction Material Costs Escalation

The initial step involves evaluating the current Construction Material Costs Escalation and comprehending its potential implications for your business. Once you have identified your essential requirements, you can start devising strategies for negotiating prices while keeping your overall profitability in mind.

To shield your business from surging costs at an early stage, it is advisable to negotiate an escalation provision. However, you must employ strategic tactics to establish conditions that owners would be willing to accept. Moreover, many companies are adopting an integrated project delivery approach during the initial stages of design and construction, engaging a team of individuals (including subcontractors) to alleviate the impact and determine the most favorable course of action.

Conducting a situational analysis

Commence by conducting a situational analysis, taking into account the present market conditions and projected trends. It can be beneficial to identify specific materials that are likely to experience price increases, as you can then target those resources in a restricted Construction Material Costs Escalation.

Explore alternatives

Conduct thorough research on various material sources, market-appropriate pricing, and industry standards. Additionally, consider the anticipated fluctuations in material costs in the near future to proactively prepare yourself. These insights will assist you in negotiating favorable prices for both yourself and the owners.

Transparency leads to fair settlement

In theory, neither the contractor nor the owner benefits from Construction Material Costs Escalation: the contractor passes on their cost escalation premiums to their suppliers, and the owner still receives the same scope and specifications. To increase the likelihood of a fair resolution, the development and subsequent review of material escalation claims should address both qualitative and quantitative factors.

The qualitative factors described below explain why escalation is necessary, outline efforts to minimize Construction Material Costs Escalation, and identify other relevant mitigating circumstances. The claim presentation should be clear and easy to follow, providing a timeline that summarizes the changing macroeconomic environment in relation to key project milestones. It should also be supported by detailed calculations, available meeting notes, and relevant external data sources.

Qualitative considerations

1. Implement contract terms: Carefully examine the contract language. Does it include a clearly defined escalation clause that addresses the current situation? If not, engage in proactive discussions to establish a mutually agreed-upon understanding of any ambiguous areas.
2. Describe mitigation efforts: Outline the actions taken to minimize the impact of rising material costs. Common steps include expanding the supplier pool, pre-purchasing materials in bulk, and developing an offsite storage plan.
3. Support the claim with data: The claim should include detailed and accurate data regarding the specific product items mentioned in the claim, along with estimated costs and the cost at the time of purchase. Support each data point with vendor invoices and relevant pricing data.
4. Define other costs not included in the claim: Document the contribution and commitment to the overall partnership resulting from absorbing additional costs. For example, quantify costs related to additional internal management and coordination of new suppliers, which are not part of the claim.

Construction Material Costs Escalation is the difference between two fundamental figures: actual costs minus estimated costs. However, both inputs can be interpreted differently, leading to potential delays in settlement and costly litigation.

Once the dialogue has commenced, both parties should thoroughly analyze the numbers. According to Grant Thornton Forensics Managing Director Alex Koltsov, it is crucial to keep the end goal in mind. “The objective here is to demonstrate the extent to which the owner’s price increased due to unforeseen material escalation throughout the project,” he said. “To achieve this, contractors should use a conservative and defensible methodology based on reliable, accurate pricing data. They should also provide reasonable explanations for any adjustments or assumptions made in the calculation.”

Regardless of the timing, contractors should adhere to these best practices in a cost escalation claim, with support from owners. The claim should also offer a general overview of the methodology, highlight any limitations or assumptions in the calculation, and explain how the claim appropriately accounts for these limitations.

Quantitative considerations

1. Define estimated costs: Estimated costs should be based on the contractor’s bid approved by the owner, and if possible, broken down by product, unit, and price. Estimated costs serve as the starting point for any potential escalation.
2. Align actual costs with estimated costs: Actual costs should primarily address price increases compared to the initial estimates. If claiming additional units, the contractor should justify this by highlighting the amount of change order work involved or by demonstrating that the owner demanded significant changes to the means and methods.
3. Consider standard escalation factors: Contractors’ estimated costs typically incorporate assumed escalations for long-term projects (e.g., those lasting over 6 months). These escalation assumptions should be included in the calculation and supported by historical submissions and/or external price indices (e.g., Federal Reserve Economic Data).
4. Avoid broad generalizations: If possible, it is best to avoid poor data or an inability to calculate direct escalation costs. Any indirect escalation claim should be thoroughly examined due to the uncertainty and increased risk of inflated costs being passed on to the owner.

By presenting a well-balanced and supported claim that takes into account the above qualitative and quantitative recommendations, the necessary transparency is provided to effectively comprehend the overruns and proceed towards a fair resolution.

Seek assistance when needed

When dealing with intricate situations and negotiations, external support and consulting can prove invaluable. Consider collaborating with a consultant who can assess your current requirements, aid in reducing overall operational costs, and equip you with strategic approaches to managing price increases. The right expertise will help you procure construction materials at cost-effective prices and navigate negotiations successfully.

Rely on Asia Pacific Projects to oversee construction Material Costs Escalation

If you require consultation services to effectively handle Construction Material Costs Escalation and optimize your material usage, Asia pacific Projects is here to assist you. We specialize in solving complex issues for construction companies, offering the necessary expertise and resources.

From identifying emerging risks to providing dispute resolution services, we are a trusted authority in addressing critical requirements for your company. We take pride in maintaining exceptional customer satisfaction and have earned the trust of our clients through reliable support.Partner with us for service solutions and let us streamline your project management. Contact us today for more information.

Please send information or requests that you need to consult for Asia Pacific Projects via:

NGUYEN THI HIEU | Local Relations

Mobile phone: +84 918 331 489

Email: hieu.nguyen@appmvn.com